Workaround build failure on -fno-common toolchains like upstream
gcc-10. Otherwise build fails as:
ld: cgminer-driver-modminer.o:/build/source/miner.h:285:
multiple definition of `bitforce_drv'; cgminer-cgminer.o:/build/source/miner.h:285:
first defined here
Since glibc 2.26 the string.h file includes <strings.h>, which in case
of cuneiform will include the strings.h found in Kern/hhh/tigerh/h,
because of the search path order.
Fortunately for us the strings.h in cuneiform are completely unused and
no files reference or include it. I even checked various references to
types within strings.h and the only occurences are in cf_strings.h,
which is also included by other files.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@nix.build>
Cc: @7c6f434c
(My OCD kicked in today...)
Remove repeated package names, capitalize first word, remove trailing
periods and move overlong descriptions to longDescription.
I also simplified some descriptions as well, when they were particularly
long or technical, often based on Arch Linux' package descriptions.
I've tried to stay away from generated expressions (and I think I
succeeded).
Some specifics worth mentioning:
* cron, has "Vixie Cron" in its description. The "Vixie" part is not
mentioned anywhere else. I kept it in a parenthesis at the end of the
description.
* ctags description started with "Exuberant Ctags ...", and the
"exuberant" part is not mentioned elsewhere. Kept it in a parenthesis
at the end of description.
* nix has the description "The Nix Deployment System". Since that
doesn't really say much what it is/does (especially after removing
the package name!), I changed that to "Powerful package manager that
makes package management reliable and reproducible" (borrowed from
nixos.org).
* Tons of "GNU Foo, Foo is a [the important bits]" descriptions
is changed to just [the important bits]. If the package name doesn't
contain GNU I don't think it's needed to say it in the description
either.
Sergei Trofimovich