* libreoffice-still: -> 6.0.6.2
* (newer than our current 'fresh!')
* libreoffice-fresh: -> 6.1.0.3
* 6.1.1(.1) is currently pre-release, FWIW
* Use normal gcc, not gcc5
* dropping 'glibc' from buildInputs fixed this (?)
* remove many fixes/touchups/workarounds/hacks
* hopefully everything still works for everyone
* disable online update since that seems unlikely to work anyway
* fix autogen/configure invocations
* disable libnumbertext in 6.1.x since not packaged
* drop 'touch solenv/inc/target.mk' as unclear what it was for
and doesn't seem to be currently needed
* cleanup link gen a bit[1]
* split checks to check phase
[1]
primary motivation was to stop creating links like:
'libreoffice-6.0.5.2/src/-libxslt-1.1.32.tar.gz' -> '/nix/store/503v5hmhm430bld0h078gacmkniwdllr-libxslt-1.1.32.tar.gz'
'libreoffice-6.0.5.2/src/libxslt-1.1.32.tar.gz' -> '/nix/store/503v5hmhm430bld0h078gacmkniwdllr-libxslt-1.1.32.tar.gz'
This is mostly accomplished by simply using the 'md5name' field
which the python script kindly generates for us
(including the use of non-md5 if md5 is not set or empty).
Since years I'm not maintaining anything of the list below other
than some updates when I needed them for some reason. Other people
is doing that maintenance on my behalf so I better take me out but
for very few packages. Finally!
1. For some reason libreoffice-still was still referencing the Fresh
expression.
2. Moved gdb from buildInputs to nativeBuildInputs.
3. Minor update for both branches.
This change removes the spadmin wrapper because the utility was removed from LibreOffice in release 4.3. See https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleaseNotes/4.3#CUPS.2C_fax_machines_and_spadmin which states:
> The graphical utility spadmin is now removed in favor of these new features and the operating system's standard printer administration tools. (Caolán McNamara)
Closes#26671
This removes the "Development Build" message from the splash screen as well as
changes all references in the program from LibreOfficeDev to LibreOffice.
The old forms presumably predates, or were made in ignorance of,
`let inherit`. This way is better style as the scoping as more lexical,
something which Nix can (or might already!) take advantage of.
Vladimír Čunát