website: small formatting changes

infra/website/content/blog/124_be_wrong.md

@@ -25,9 +25,9 @@ even more uncomfortable with.
 This style of rhetoric, the "taking apart an argument so I don't have
 to think about it too hard", has become very common in modern
 discourse.  This is driven by the "fight or flight" response of the
-amygdala in our brains [^1].  A feeling of physical anxiety floods us when
+amygdala in our brains. [^1] A feeling of physical anxiety floods us
-we are on the defensive, for whatever reason.  And all logic goes out
+when we are on the defensive, for whatever reason.  And all logic goes
-the window.
+out the window.
 
 Many of the arguments you see online (and many offline too, don't get
 me wrong!) center around this emotional response and it is one that
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ Admitting to being wrong is seen as a weakness and connected to shame,
 a loss of status, and humiliation.  And so, we are never wrong.  We
 attack our intellectual oponents in order to relieve ourselves of the
 responsibility of having to engage with an argument that makes us
-uncomfortable.  This is how filter bubbles get created too [^2].
+uncomfortable.  This is how filter bubbles get created too. [^2]
 
 [^1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fight-or-flight_response#Reaction
 [^2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filter_bubble#Ethical_implications